Art, Craft, Technology

Kursusindhold

This course asks how cultural policy has produced institutional distinctions between categories of fine art, craft, and technology; and how these distinctions reflect and enforce hierarchies of race, gender, culture, geography, and class structured by colonialism and capitalism. Furthermore, how have artists and cultural workers renegotiated art-craft-technology distinctions to engage art as a tool for critical or oppositional cultural politics that challenge dominant social hierarchies, propose imaginative or utopian social visions, and intervene in the construction of everyday life?

To address these questions, this course will consider recent case studies in the relationship between art, craft, and technology that are shaped by longer histories of colonialism, capitalism, geopolitical rivalry, and nation-building. We will examine how historical cultural policies formed by these processes are reinforced or challenged in contemporary cultural production, whether in institutional practices or artistic modes of subversion.

The first part will look at how contemporary distinctions between art, craft, and technology are rooted in colonial cultural policy, and the ways that these distinctions have subsequently been challenged in anti-colonial movements, post-colonial state-building, and contemporary initiatives for decolonization. Focusing on the legacies of British colonialism in South Asia, we will investigate how art and design education interacted with colonial administration to divide Indian cultural production into separate categories of art and craft, giving rise to the modern conception of fine art as a specialized practice and mode of commodity production defined by its lack of direct utility and the limited autonomy of its producers. We will also see how cultural initiatives in decolonization have both challenged and affirmed art-craft-technology distinctions by examining case studies including contemporary art education and art-artisan collaborations in Pakistan.

The second part will consider how technological research and development shaped by geopolitical rivalries has informed cultural policy and cultural production. Beginning with histories of Cold War modernization initiatives and the military industrial complex in the US, we will consider how these processes produced collaborations between artists, scientists, universities, think tanks, and corporations. We will examine contemporary case studies shaped by the legacies of such Cold War initiatives, such as artistic interventions in surveillance technologies and the way that Silicon Valley culture of ‘disruptive innovation’ has refracted in artistic practices.

The third and final part will consider infrastructures of globalization as a site of both explicit and implicit cultural policy, and the way that it reorganizes the divisions between elite and mass forms of cultural production in postcolonial contexts. Our case studies will include the contemporary mass production and circulation of devotional images commonly printed in calendars in India, as well as the ways that the expansion of mass media infrastructures in India after 1990s liberalization enabled new forms of artistic production that have circulated in elite art markets.

Across the course, we will examine how our core case studies are shaped by different forms of cultural policy and enable and/or inhibit different kinds of cultural politics. We will also consider what kinds of methodological frameworks we can employ in their analysis, including both tools introduced in the course’s first module, such as ideas of governmentality and the public sphere; as well as concepts in postcolonial, decolonial, and technological discourses such as aesthesis and cosmotechnics.

 

Engelsk titel

Moderne kultur/Kunsthistorie: Kulturpolitik: Art, Craft, Technology

Målbeskrivelse

Efter endt kursus kan den studerende demonstrere:

 

Viden om og forståelse af

  • det kulturpolitiske felt og de værdipolitiske, organisatoriske, økonomiske, administrative og formidlingsmæssige forhold i offentlig og privat kulturvirksomhed.
  • kulturpolitikkens værdigrundlag og konkrete virkemidler, og hvordan disse påvirker kunstens og/eller kulturens produktion, reception og formidling i samfundet.
  • teori- og metodetraditioner inden for det kulturpolitiske felt.
  • kulturindustriernes organisering og indvirkning på det kulturpolitiske felt.
  • teknologiers og de digitale mediers indvirkning på det kulturpolitiske felt.

 

 

Færdigheder i at

  • identificere og forklare et konkret og afgrænset kulturpolitisk emne i relation til kulturpolitikkens aktuelle problemstillinger og udfordringer.
  • redegøre for og anvende viden om kunstens og kulturens værdipolitiske, institutionelle og markedsmæssige rammebetingelser.
  • udføre en undersøgelse hvor relevante teorier og metoder forklares og anvendes i forhold til specifikke kulturpolitiske problemstillinger.

 

Kompetencer til at

  • anvende og kritisk vurdere kunst- og kulturinstitutionernes virke og betydning, samt kulturpolitikkens, kulturens og kunstens roller i samfundet.
  • diskutere og kritisk vurdere kulturpolitiske praksisser, problemstillinger og udfordringer.

This course will comprise a combination of lectures, seminars, and small group discussions focused on specific case studies. Students will be expected to complete weekly readings and prepare questions and comments on the assigned materials prior to each class. The final session will be dedicated to a full-day workshop where students can work with the theories and methods introduced across the course as a whole and prepare for their final assignment. Prior to the workshop, students must submit a written mandatory assignment, which constitutes an introduction, research question, theoretical and methodological framework to their exam assignments.

Literature:

 

Beck, John, and Ryan Bishop. Technocrats of the Imagination: Art, Technology, and the Military-Industrial Avant-Garde. Duke University Press, 2020.

 

Arindam Dutta, The Bureaucracy of Beauty: Design in the Age of Its Global Reproducibility. Routledge, 2007.

 

Partha Mitter, Much Maligned Monsters: A History of European Reactions to Indian Art. University of Chicago Press, 1992.

 

Walter Mignolo and Rolando Vazquez, “Decolonial AestheSis: Colonial Wounds/Decolonial Healings” Social Text Online, July 15, 2013. https://socialtextjournal.org/periscope_article/decolonial-aesthesis-colonial-woundsdecolonial-healings/

 

Yuk Hui, The Question Concerning Technology in China: An Essay in Cosmotechnics. Falmouth: Urbanomic, 2018.

 

Kajri Jain, Gods in the Bazaar: The Economies of Indian Calendar Art. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2007.

 

Pamela M. Lee, Think Tank Aesthetics: Midcentury Modernism, the Cold War, and the Neoliberal Present. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.

 

Mathur, Saloni, and Kavita Singh, eds. No Touching, No Spitting, No Praying: The Museum in South Asia. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2015.

Nadeem Omar Tarar, The Colonial and National Formations of the National College of Arts, Lahore, circa 1870s to 1960s: De-scripting the Archive. London: Anthem Press, 2022.

 

Karin Zitzewitz, Infrastructure and Form: The Global Networks of Indian Contemporary Art, 1991–2008. Oakland, California: University of California Press, 2022

This course is one out of three cultural policy courses that constitute the second half of the cultural policy module (the first part is the mandatory course Cultural policy: Theory, method & analysis). Students therefore choose either this course or Cultural Policy: Reading the 80s. Photography and Identity in Thatcher's Britain

Skriftlig
Mundtlig
Individuel
ECTS
15 ECTS
Prøveform
Hjemmeopgave , fri hjemmeopgave, 11-15 sider
Prøveformsdetaljer
Prøven kan aflægges individuelt eller som gruppeprøve (maks. 3 studerende) med individuel bedømmelse.
Hvis flere studerende skriver sammen, skal hver enkelt deltagers bidrag være en afrundet helhed, der er identificeret og kan bedømmes for sig. Deltagernes fællesbidrag må ikke overstige 50%. Omfang ved gruppeprøve: 16-22 normalsider (2 studerende) eller 22-
30 normalsider (3 studerende).
Hjælpemidler
Alle hjælpemidler tilladt

 For regler om generativ kunstig intelligens, se Studieinformation.

Bedømmelsesform
7-trins skala
Censurform
Ingen ekstern censur
Eksamensperiode

Samme som den ordinære prøve. 

Kriterier for bedømmelse

Se målbeskrivelse. 

  • Kategori
  • Timer
  • Holdundervisning
  • 0
  • Total
  • 0

Kursusinformation

Undervisningssprog
Engelsk
Kursusnummer
HMKK03682U
ECTS
15 ECTS
Niveau
Kandidat
Varighed

1 semester

Placering
Efterår
Kapacitet
40 studerende
Studienævn
Studienævnet for Kunst- og Kulturvidenskab
Udbydende institut
  • Institut for Kunst og Kulturvidenskab
Udbydende fakultet
  • Det Humanistiske Fakultet
Kursusansvarlig
  • Kylie Yvonne Gilchrist   (3-6e6a6c436b7870316e7831676e)
Underviser

Kylie Gildchrist

Gemt den 30-04-2026

Er du BA- eller KA-studerende?

Er du bachelor- eller kandidat-studerende, så find dette kursus i kursusbasen for studerende:

Kursusinformation for indskrevne studerende