Open Works: Art, Science, and the Transnational Avant-Gardes

Course content

This course asks how “open works” of 20th century avant-garde practices overturned artistic conventions and decentered dominant knowledge paradigms amidst wider processes of decolonization and globalization.

“Open works,” as defined by Italian philosopher Umberto Eco, comprise modern art that is structured by chance effects, ambiguity, and perceptual instability, producing a “field of possibilities” for viewing publics. Such “open works,” Eco identified, emerged as spatio-temporal relativity and quantum mechanics revolutionized science by undermining the classical premise of a fixed and predictable cosmic order. The “open work,” Eco proposed, responds to this rupture through a radical break with traditional artistic conventions.

Interrogating the pre-histories, trajectories, and political salience of “open works,” this course traces a counter-narrative of the 20th century turn from object-based to conceptual art practices. Beginning with pre-WWII avant-gardes, we examine how widespread artistic interest in a speculative “fourth dimension” and quantum theory enabled surrealist and concrete art avant-gardes to break with perspectival representation and access domains of critical truth that subvert social conventions.

Turning to the post-war context, we will study a range of artistic groups producing “open works,” as identified by Eco, including the New Tendency movement active across Europe, the Arte Programmata movement in Italy, and kinetic art avant-gardes between London and Paris. Locating these artists as forerunners of an international turn from object-based to conceptual or “dematerialized” practices, we will critically examine how these artists advanced subversive and radical cosmic imaginations while also risking collusion with forces of technocratic governance.

Shifting to the 1970s, we will subsequently consider how artists further radicalized “open works” through a turn towards sociology, anthropology, and information theory, examining practices such as Nil Yalter’s “ethno-critical” art and the media interventions of the Collectif d’Art Sociologique in Paris and the Laboratorio di Com

We will conclude by investigating contemporary resonances of this trajectory, examining critical engagements with scientific ideas by artists such as Black Quantum Futurism, as well as the way that “open works” more broadly enabled the current prevalence of art-making as a process of collective transdisciplinary research. Throughout this course, we will attend closely to the ways that these artistic practices engage with global political dynamics, including artistic negotiations of economic crisis and authoritarian governance, the significance of artists’ migrant and racialized experiences, and their engagement with feminist, anti-colonial, and New Left social movements.

Learning outcome

to the exam, the student can demonstrate:

 

Knowledge of and understanding of

  • one or more current research areas within art, visual culture and/or cultural studies.
  • Theoretical and methodological perspectives on issues with a focus on, for example, political, institutional, cultural, and/or cultural sociology issues and developments.

 

Skills in

  • independently defining and preparing a cultural studies issue.
  • analyzing works of art, cultural phenomena, theories and/or artistic and/or cultural historical movements.
  • Reflecting on one's methodological approach, including incorporating academic literature in a reflective and critical manner.
  • Communicate the results of an investigation of a professional issue in a clear and well-structured form and in grammatically correct language.

 

Competencies to

  • carry out independent investigations of art and/or cultural studies issues. Working theoretically, methodologically and empirically with specific art and cultural studies issues.

 

 

 

 

 

One or more courses are offered in connection with the subject element. The teaching alternates between lectures in plenary and analytical work in small groups. Peer feedback is continuously used.

Pensum
900 normalsider, heraf udvælges 600 normalsider af underviser og 300 normalsider udvælges af eksaminanden. Underviserens del af pensum skal meddeles de studerende ved kursets start. 

 

Literature:

Gaston Bachelard, The New Scientific Spirit. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Beacon Press, 1984.

Robert Bailey. Art & Language International: Conceptual Art between Art Worlds. Duke University Press, 2016.

Jack Burnham. “Systems Aesthetics (1968).” In Dissolve into Comprehension: Writings and Interviews, 1964-2004, edited by Melissa Ragain. MIT Press, 2015.

Lindsay Caplan. Arte Programmata: Freedom, Control, and the Computer in 1960s Italy. University of Minnesota Press, 2022.

Umberto Eco. The Open Work. Translated by Anna Cancogni. Harvard University Press, 1989.

Linda Dalrymple Henderson. The Fourth Dimension and Non-Euclidean Geometry in Modern Art. MIT Press, 2013.

Michael Leruth. Fred Forest’s Utopia: Media Art and Activism. MIT Press, 2017.

Jacopo Galimberti. Individuals against Individualism: Art Collectives in Western Europe, 1956-1969. Liverpool University Press, 2017.

Thomas S Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1962.

Armin Medosch. New Tendencies: Art at the Threshold of the Information Revolution (1961-1978). MIT Press, 2016.

Abraham Moles. Information Theory and Esthetic Perception. University of Illinois Press, 1966.

Anaïs Nony. Performative Images: A Philosophy of Video Art Technology in France. Routledge, 2023.

Gavin Parkinson. Surrealism, Art and Modern Science: Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Epistemology. Yale University Press, 2008.

Chanon Kenji Praepipatmongkol. “David Medalla: Dreams of Sculpture.” Oxford Art Journal 43, no. 3 (2020): 339–59.

Boaventura de Sousa Santos. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Routledge, 2016.

Catherine Spencer. Beyond the Happening: Performance Art and the Politics of Communication. Manchester University Press, 2020.

Lily Woodruff. Disordering the Establishment: Participatory Art and Institutional Critique in France, 1958-1981. Duke University Press, 2020.

 

Continuous feedback during the course of the semester
ECTS
15 ECTS
Type of assessment
Portfolio, 16-20 norm-pages
Type of assessment details
The portfolio consists of a number of set assignments that are set during the semester. At the beginning of the semester, the teacher sets the deadlines for when the different elements in the portfolio can be submitted for feedback. Feedback is given on the assignments that are submitted by the deadline set by the teacher during the semester. The feedback can consist of individual and/or collective feedback from the teacher and/or the other team members. The final portfolio consists of a total set of the set assignments, where the student has had the opportunity to incorporate any feedback. The portfolio can, by agreement, consist of both written elements and audiovisual elements. The audiovisual material is converted with 2 minutes of playing time to 1 standard page.

Group regulations: The exam can only be taken individually
Examination language: English.
Aid
All aids allowed
Marking scale
7-point grading scale
Censorship form
No external censorship
Internal exam with several examiners
Criteria for exam assessment

See the goal description

  • Category
  • Hours
  • Class Instruction
  • 0
  • English
  • 0

Kursusinformation

Language
English
Course number
HKUK03841U
ECTS
15 ECTS
Programme level
Full Degree Master
Duration

1 semester

Placement
Spring
Capacity
40
Studyboard
Study board of Arts and Cultural Studies
Contracting department
  • Department of Arts and Cultural Studies
Contracting faculty
  • Faculty of Humanities
Course Coordinator
  • Kylie Yvonne Gilchrist   (3-7a76784f77847c3d7a843d737a)
Teacher

Kylie Yvonne Gilchrist

Saved on the 19-05-2026

Are you BA- or KA-student?

Are you bachelor- or kandidat-student, then find the course in the course catalog for students:

Courseinformation of students