Policy Instruments and Design for Sustainable Transition
Course content
Understanding policy instruments and how they can be combined is essential for making policy for sustainable transition, but it is also essential to understand the political and institutional context within which the instrument choices take place. In liberal democracies, policy making is most often characterised by political contestation and compromise as various actors have stakes in the specific design of policy. While economic rationality may feed into the process, it is just one factor in the decision-making process. Political and institutional conditions must be factored in to understand instrument choices.
Complexity is a feature of most green transition challenges. Therefore, there is a growing recognition in the policy sciences that policy mixes consisting of a combination of instruments can be a strategy to help bringing about the desired transition. Policy mixes already exist in many policy sectors, but often they have evolved over time by gradual ad hoc layering of new instruments on to the existing policy. Hence, the course will delve into the way in which policy mixes evolve over time with an emphasis on the political and institutional drivers of instrument choice. An important political factor relates to the social construction of target groups and how this influences instrument choice and calibration. Target groups can be socially constructed on the basis of whether they are deserving or undeserving and whether they are politically strong or weak. Further, the institutional context is crucial in understanding instrument choices. For instance, who are granted access to the instrument design process and which concerns are paid attention and which are ignored.
While policy instruments and mixes will be at the centre of the course it is important also to consider the policy paradigms within which instruments are embedded. Instrument choices for transition rarely start from a blank sheet but rather from a situation in which there are already sectoral policies in place. Hence, to anticipate policy design challenges, it is important to understand the nature of the policy paradigm dominating a sector and how they influence design spaces.
The course will introduce key concepts for understanding the nature policy instruments, how they are selected and combined. Cases will be used illustrate the utility of the concepts and to engage in critical reflection on their application to actual policy situations. This will enable the participant to explain and make sense of policy instruments and design in different national and sectoral settings. It will deepen their knowledge of policy making and develop competencies to design public policies for sustainable transition.
MSc Programme in European Environmental Economics and Policy
Knowledge
Upon completion of the course, the participants will have obtained knowledge on:
- instrument typologies and how they can be used to identify instrument types and their motivational rationales,
- the concept of policy mixes and how to use it to consider the relationship between instrument types in mix,
- theoretical concept to understand evolution of instrument mixes including the drivers of evolution,
- the nature and importance of the social construction as well as heterogeneity of target groups in policy making, and
- concepts of interests, institutions and paradigm and how they can be applied to explain instrument choices and policy mixes
Skills
Upon completion of the course, the participants must be able to:
- formulate relevant questions related to the choice and design policy instruments and policy mixes in relation sustainable transition policies,
- apply theoretical concepts to identify challenges in designing policy for green transition,
- apply theoretical concepts to explain such challenges,
- explain the political and institutional dimensions of instrument choice and policy mixes, and
- critically reflect on the strengths and limitations of the key concepts in relation to their ability to understand policy instruments and design.
Competences
Upon completion of the course, the participants must be able to:
- apply instrument typologies to characterize real-world public policies and discuss their motivational rationales,
- use theoretical concepts to characterize and explain evolution of public policies,
- identify target groups for policy and analyse how they are perceived and which interests they pursue in instrument choices, and
- analyse how institutions may influence instrument choices in specific policy decisions
Teaching will be based on different activities. Lectures will introduce the key concepts of the course. Groups discussion will be used for deliberation on how the concepts can be used to understand real-world cases and for critical reflection on the concepts’ ability to make empirical and practical sense of instrument choices and mixes. At the end of the course, a workshop will be organised to provide input to the participants’ work on the discussion paper (synopsis) for the oral exam.
A reading list will be available one to two weeks before the course starts. These areticles are examples of readings:
Howlett, M. (2018). Matching policy tools and their targets: Beyond nudges and utility maximization in policy design. Policy & Politics, 46(1), 101–124.
Oberthür, S., & von Homeyer, I. (2022). From emissions trading to the European Green Deal: the evolution of the climate policy mix and climate policy integration in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(3), 445–468.
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (2015). Making distinctions: the social construction of target populations. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová and m Orsini (eds.), Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar Publishing
It is recommended that students have obtained minimum 60 ECTS in political science and/or economics, or in other social science disciplines
- ECTS
- 7,5 ECTS
- Type of assessment
-
Oral exam on basis of previous submission, 30 minutes - no time for preparation
- Type of assessment details
- Individual oral exam based on a 2000 words discussion paper (synopsis) and the required readings. The discussion paper (synopsis) must be submitted a week before the exam week starts. Students work on the discussion paper (synopsis) during the course.
- Aid
- All aids allowed except Generative AI and internet access
- Marking scale
- 7-point grading scale
- Censorship form
- No external censorship
Two internal examiners
- Re-exam
-
Same as the ordinary exam.
The discussion paper must be submitted two weeks before the re-exam week starts
Criteria for exam assessment
Students' ability to demonstrate obtained knowledge, skills and competences (see learning outcomes) with particular emphasis on students' ability to demonstrate understanding of theoretical concepts and their use to answer empirical questions as well as ability to critically reflect on them.
Single subject courses (day)
- Category
- Hours
- Lectures
- 30
- Preparation
- 120
- Theory exercises
- 30
- Study Groups
- 25
- Exam
- 1
- English
- 206
Kursusinformation
- Language
- English
- Course number
- NIFK25002U
- ECTS
- 7,5 ECTS
- Programme level
- Full Degree Master
- Duration
-
1 block
- Placement
- Block 2
- Schedulegroup
-
B
- Capacity
- 42
The number of places might be reduced if you register in the late-registration period (BSc and MSc) or as a credit or single subject student. - Studyboard
- Study Board of Natural Resources, Environment and Animal Science
Contracting department
- Department of Food and Resource Economics
Contracting faculty
- Faculty of Science
Course Coordinator
- Carsten Daugbjerg (3-676865446d6a7673326f7932686f)
Er du BA- eller KA-studerende?
Kursusinformation for indskrevne studerende