Reparation Politics: Living in a Damaged World

Course content

Across the globe, our sociopolitical forms of coexistence are shaped by the enduring effects of both past and present damage. Whether through violence and human rights violations, colonial dispossession, or environmental devastation, learning to live in a damaged world and repairing what has been broken is becoming an essential form of survival, social struggle, and world-making.

 

Today, reparations emerge as a powerful promise: a way of inhabiting the world that holds the potential to inspire new and vibrant forms of coexistence. Thus, reparation politics have become a central focus of contemporary political struggles and state-citizen relations and for imaging the future. However, the notion of reparations remains notoriously ambiguous, with its meaning varying across social domains and national contexts.

 

In this course, we will explore the origins and present manifestations of reparation politics and their possible effects. We will examine the various forms that reparations take in different contexts, how past and ongoing damage is translated into concrete restorative measures, and the future forms of social and political belonging that arise through these processes. Finally, we will ask: what lessons can be learned from these processes?

 

We will read ethnographies in the following areas:

 

 •   Human rights violations and post-conflict situations

 •   Indigenous dispossession and postcolonial struggles

 •   Environmental damage and its repercussions

Education

Enrolled students register the course through the Selfservice. Please contact the study administration at each programme for questions regarding registration.

 

The course is open to:

  • Exchange and Guest students from abroad
  • Credit students from Danish Universities
Learning outcome

Knowledge:

  • Be able to demonstrate an understanding of key debates and standpoints in the field of reparation politics
  • Be able to apply anthropological concepts in the analysis of reparation politics across social fields (human rights violations, indigenous dispossession, environmental degradation).
  • Be able to locate and analyze different empirical material by applying analytical perspectives from the course literature in order to make an anthropological argument 
  • be able to write a well-structured portfolio on a chosen field/case drawing on the literature from anthropology and other related disciplines

 

Skills:

  • To be able to apply anthropological concepts in the analysis of current cases pf reparation politics .
  • To be able to compare reparation politics and practices across social fields (human rights violations, indigenous dispossession, environmental degradation) and in global comparison.
  • To be able to analyse the social and political effects of reparation politics

 

Competences:

  • To choose, apply and transfer relevant theoretical concepts and ideas from anthropology in the analysis of reparation politics of political issues, conflicts and phenomena in other contexts.
  • To be able to plan and manage a written portfolio.
  • To be able to independently and collectively initiate and manage feedback processes that facilitates self-assessment.

The course will be based on a combination of lectures and interactive seminars where students contribute actively through group work, discussions, readings, oral and written presentations, and peer-feedback.

BSc students and MSc students: 500 pages obligatory literature.

The teacher will publish 200-300 pages of supplementary literature.

Course literature will be available through Absalon.

Continuous feedback during the course of the semester
Peer feedback (Students give each other feedback)

Continuous feedback during the course of the semester.

Feedback on portfolio assignments from peers, as well as general feedback from the teacher.

ECTS
7,5 ECTS
Type of assessment
Portfolio, -
Type of assessment details
Length: Portfolio exam can be written individually or in groups of max. 4 students. Portfolio exams consist of 2-7 submissions. For MA students, there is a submission more than for BA students, i.e. if the BA student has to submit five submissions, the MA students must submit six submissions. The number of submissions is set by the lecturer. The total length of all of the submissions must be max. 30,000 keystrokes for one BA student and max. 37,500 keystrokes for one MA student. For groups of two students, max. 40,000 keystrokes BA students and max. 47,500 for MA students. For groups of three students, max. 45,000 keystrokes for BA students and max. 52,500 for MA students. For groups of four students, max. 50,000 keystrokes for BA students and 57,500 for MA students. In the case of group assignments, the contribution of each individual student must be clearly marked in the assignment. For groups with both BA and MA students, the same number of submissions is required as for MA students. The assignments are assessed jointly with a single grade.
For groups writing together it must be clearly indicated which parts of the assignment each of the students has written.
Aid
All aids allowed

Policy on the Use of Generative AI Software and Large Language Models in Exams

The Department of Anthropology allows the use of generative AI software and large language models (AI/LLMs), such as ChatGPT, in written exams, provided that the use of AI/LLMs is disclosed and specified (i.e., how it was used and for what purpose) in an appendix that does not count towards the page limit of the exam.

 

If AI/LLMs are used as source, the same requirements apply for using quotation marks and source referencing as with all other sources. Otherwise, it will be a case of plagiarism.

Marking scale
7-point grading scale
Censorship form
No external censorship
Re-exam

1st re-exam: An essay must be submitted. The new assignment must be submitted by the deadline for the re-exam.

2nd re-exam: A new essay must be submitted. The new assignment must be submitted by the deadline for the re-exam.

One BA student: 21.600-26.400 keystrokes. For group responses, Min. 6,750 and Max. 8,250 extra keystrokes per extra group member.

One MA student: 27,000-33,000 keystrokes. For group responses, Min. 8,450 and Max. 10,300 extra keystrokes per extra group member.

For groups with both BA and MA students:
A MA and a BA student: 31,900-38,975 (BA: 14.175-17.325 KA: 17.725-21.650)
A MA and two BA students: 38,050 – 46,475 (BA: 11,700-14.300 KA: 14.650-17.875)
A MA and three BA students: 44,525-54,375 (BA: 10.475-12,800 MA: 13.100-15.975)
Two MA and one BA student: 41,000-50,050 (BA: 11,700-14.300 KA: 14.650-17.875)
Two MA and two BA students: 47,150-57,550 (BA: 10.475-12,800 MA: 13.100-15.975)
Three MA and one BA student: 49,775-60,725 (BA: 10.475-12,800 MA: 13.100-15.975)

For groups writing together it must be clearly indicated which parts of the assignment each of the students has written.

Criteria for exam assessment

See learning outcome

  • Category
  • Hours
  • Lectures
  • 42
  • Preparation
  • 100
  • Exam Preparation
  • 64
  • English
  • 206

Kursusinformation

Language
English
Course number
AANA18142U
ECTS
7,5 ECTS
Programme level
Bachelor
Bachelor choice
Full Degree Master
Full Degree Master choice
Duration

1 semester

Placement
Spring
Schedulegroup
See timetable.
Studyboard
Department of Anthropology, Study Council
Contracting department
  • Department of Anthropology
Contracting faculty
  • Faculty of Social Sciences
Course Coordinator
  • Helene Risør   (13-757279727b723b7f76807c727f4d6e7b81757f7c3b78823b7178)
Saved on the 13-12-2024

Er du BA- eller KA-studerende?

Er du bachelor- eller kandidat-studerende, så find dette kursus i kursusbasen for studerende:

Kursusinformation for indskrevne studerende